Tom Williams

Chandler on Film?

October 27, 2009 · Leave a Comment

I just stumbled across a video filmed on the 17th of March 1918 of Canadian soldiers being presented to America dignitaries at the CEF HQ on the Western Front.The significance of this is that Chandler arrived in France on 16th of March and it is easy to imagine that Canadian commanders would show off their freshest troops. It is a long shot of course but I can’t help but wonder as I watch this video if Chandler is amongst these men.

 

I have to say that I am a bit bogged down in Chandler’s war experiences. Not being a military historian, I have found it difficult to decode some of the abbreviations in the records of his war service. Still, it seems to me, that there the past biographies haven’t really told the story of Chandler’s war experiences fully so I hope that mine will set that straight.

→ Leave a CommentCategories: Raymond Chandler
Tagged:

Reasons to be quiet

July 12, 2009 · Leave a Comment

I just wanted to let you know why I’ve been so quiet for the last couple of months. After a fantastic three months in LA I had to return to home to the UK. I was very lucky in that the company I work for, PFD, have given me a sabbatical while I researched. Now that I am back though, I have to work pretty hard. Plus, I’ve been promoted to Associate Agent and have only just got used to that.

Anyway, the long and the short of it is – I am still working on Raymond and I will get back to updating this blog very soon.

Best to you all

Tom

→ Leave a CommentCategories: Raymond Chandler
Tagged:

Chandler on the BBC

April 14, 2009 · 1 Comment

I was recently interviewed about Raymond Chandler by a BBC journalist for a piece she did to mark the 50th Anniversary of his death. You can listen to the programme here. The Chandler segment starts about seven minutes in.

→ 1 CommentCategories: Raymond Chandler
Tagged:

Extraodinary Day

April 11, 2009 · 3 Comments

I’ve just had the most exciting couple of days at UCLA. One of the librarians approached me today and told me that she had some uncatalogued Chandler letters and asked if I would like to see them.

Yes, Please. I responded. And, a few minutes later I was pouring over a package of letters that I don’t think have been seen before by a biographer. My heart was thumping and my palms were sweaty as I read these new letters because they told me a lot of news things about Chandler. They shed light on his life in an entirely unexpected way and it was thrilling. I don’t want to go into too much detail yet but I will soon, I hope. And I think, when I do, I will be able to add to our understanding of Chandler.

Stay posted.

→ 3 CommentsCategories: Raymond Chandler
Tagged:

Raymond Chandler’s Hollywood Secretary

April 3, 2009 · Leave a Comment

Judith Freeman has written a piece in today’s LA Times about her meeting Chandler’s secretary. Its an interesting piece and I thought I’d share it. Click here to read it.

→ Leave a CommentCategories: Raymond Chandler
Tagged:

The Bank of Italy Building

April 2, 2009 · Leave a Comment

This is the building where Chandler had his office in the 1920s

This is the building where Chandler had his office in the 1920s

I headed into downtown Los Angeles yesterday afternoon to visit the Bank of Italy buidling where Raymond Chandler had his office in the 1920s. Then, he worked for Dabney Oil and he did very well at the company, starting off as an accountant and working his way up to being a Vice-President before being dismissed in 1932 for drinking and absenteeism. The building itself, like a lot of downtown LA, is in disrepair. Currently it is abandoned which is sad as it is a beautiful building, not that my pictures show it in its full glory. Next door is The Seven Grand Whisky Bar, an upscale cocktail place popular with LA’s young crowd. I think, somehow, that Chandler would have approved.

The Bank of Italy Building 2 What Chandler would have made of the state of  the rest of downtown LA is amusing to guess at. In the High Window he brilliantly evoked the way that Bunker Hill had changed from an upscale to a downscale residence and he would have had great fun with the current state of the city.

Chandler’s experiences downtown are important to his growth as a writer. He was, during his time at the Bank of Italy building, at the heart of LA’s political hub. He would have heard about the corruption and the cover-ups early on as gossip in the city spread. It was here that he breathed in LA’s fetid air and got to grips with it. Later, he would take his understanding of city life and rework it into his novels and short-stories. Without his oil work, he would not have been exposed to a lot of source material and we wouldn’t have had Marlowe, a point worth condsidering when we think about why Chandler was unsuccessful as a Bloomsbury writer.

→ Leave a CommentCategories: Raymond Chandler
Tagged:

Cissy’s Age

March 28, 2009 · Leave a Comment

Cissy Chandler

Cissy Chandler

On Wednesday, at the USC event to mark the 50th anniversary of Raymond Chandler’s death, Judith Freeman wittily pointed out that when she found Cissy Chandler’s death certificate at the Bodelian Library in Oxford, even that document got her date of birth wrong. It gives her birth date as 1886 making her sixty-eight at the time of her death. She was, in fact, eighty-four.

There has been a lot of speculation about whether or not Chandler knew how old Cissy was. When they married in February 1924  the marriage certificate lists Cissy’s age as forty-three when she was a whole decade older and the assumption was that Chandler didn’t, at the time, know there was a difference. I have been going through various records relating to Cissy recently, some at the Bodelian, some in America and some online, and it has made me think about the mis-truths about her age.

Firstly, the source for her date of birth is Frank McShane – I have yet to dig out her birth certificate which will be in Ohio (if anyone lives there and can help, do get in touch) – and he writes that she was born on October 29th 1870. He was an assiduous researcher and I don’t doubt his accuracy. Cissy first appears in a census in 1900, during the period she spent married to Leon Porcher, a clerk who she wed in 1897 and whom she lived with in New York. In this census her date of birth is listed as around 1875. When the next census interview her, this time in 1910, she still lived in Manhattan (but was divorced from Porcher) her birth date is again listed as around 1875 again.

Cissy moved to California after she married Julian Pascal, in 1911, and she appears in that sate’s 1920 census. This time her year of birth is noted as being 1881. The following decade by which time she has become Pearl E Chandler, her birth year is given as 1877. No wonder Chandler was so confused when her date of birth is continuously mis-represented in official. Though it does seem that she got a little better with age. In 1952 when the couple visit England together, the immigration records show that her date of birth was 1876, only six years off the date given by McShane.

Census records can often by a year or two out -  Chandler’s date of birth is sometimes 1888 and sometimes 1889 – but they are rarely so wild. It seems clear fromt his information that Cissy was very uncomfortable about admitting her age, particularly to official interviewers, and, in that, she would not be unusual. But the fact that she did it so much and of such a long period of time does make us wonder about her. Why was she so uncomfortable when all reports suggest that she was a beautiful and youthful looking woman? Why did the date change so wildly – would it not have been easier to stick to one date and keep the lie at that? And, of course, we will always question how much Raymond knew himself. For my part, I suspect he had no idea when they married but that, over time and as she became more ill, he began to suspect that she was older than she had told him. It must have been an odd to slowly realize that your wife was older than you thought and, as Judith Freeman points out in The Long Embrace, this may have been a contributing factor to the tensions in their marriage that led to a separation in 1930. When he filled out her death certificate in 1954 he performed one last act of generosity in mis-dating her birth yet again. It may raised a wry smile in our author, that, in death, his wife still managed to cheat official records listing her age correctly.

→ Leave a CommentCategories: Raymond Chandler
Tagged: ,

New Penguin Editions

March 27, 2009 · Leave a Comment

In the UK Chandler’s books were published by Hamish Hamilton. Hamish ‘Jamie’ Hamilton and Raymond became good friends, corresponding over many years and HH was – and still is – a great home for Chandler’s books. To mark the fiftieth anniversary of his death, they have released hardcover editions of The Big Sleep, Farewell, My Lovely, The Lady in the Lake, The Little Sister and The Long Goodbye. As you will see from this long, slightly dull post on the Penguin blog, they tried to base the covers on the first editions of the books and in that they were largely successful. I look forward to getting my hands on a set when I get home.

→ Leave a CommentCategories: Raymond Chandler
Tagged:

50th Anniversary of Raymond Chandler’s Death

March 26, 2009 · Leave a Comment

On this day fifty years ago Raymond Chandler died. It’s made me think about why he we still find him so fascinating and so I’ve put together this post, which are loosely associated thoughts about Chandler. I like to think of them as a first draft and look forward to hearing your thoughts and comments.

Chandler was a writer of real power and originality with an unforgettable turn of phrase, “It was a blonde. A blonde to make a bishop kick a hole in a stained glass window.” (Farewell, My Lovely). He was first and foremost a stylist. He had an enduring love of language that was nourished by a Classical education in Britain in the early twentieth century but that did not fully blossom until the 1930s when he found himself writing mystery stories for Pulp magazines like Black Mask. The stylistic nature of these stories was necessarily unforgiving but Chandler liked to sneak something into them when he could. In 1938 he decided to turn two of the stories, Killer in the Rain and The Curtain, into a novel that would be called The Big Sleep and Philip Marlowe was introduced to the world:

It was about eleven o’clock in the morning, mid October, with the sun not shining and a look of hard wet rain in the clearness of the foothills. I was wearing my powder-blue suit, with dark blue shirt, tie and display hankerchief, black brouges, black wool socks with dark blue clocks on them. I was neat, clean, shaved and sober, and I didn’t care who knew it. I was everthing the well-dressed private detective ought to be. (The Big Sleep)

The novel gave him the space to play with language in the way he wanted to and he set about doing just that, riffing on LA and its citizens in a way that no-one had done before and few people have come close to since:

What did it matter where you lay once you were dead? In a dirty sump or in a marble tower on top of a high hill? You were dead, you were sleeping the big sleep, you were not bothered by things like that. Oil and water were the same as wind and air to you. You just slep the big sleep, not caring about the nastiness of how you died or where you fell. (The Big Sleep)

Chandler’s writing method helped him. He used to tear yellow sheet of legal paper in half, feed these short sheets into his typewriter and write away, keeping the lines three spaces apart so that each sheet could fit around 12 lines on each page. He always made sure that he got “a little bit of magic” on each of these sheets in the form of an interesting phrase or description. Later, he would number these sheets and re-order them to get the best effect. Plotting was not his strong point and he would often find himself trying to shoe-horn a scene into a novel that he liked too much to abandon but which did not fit in with the plot he had hastily tacked on at the end. It was a method that allowed him to write clear and evocative prose and invent the style that we love.

Chandler’s facility with words and his sharp eye for detail made him an accute observer of LA and its inhabitants and his novels are populated with odd, unforgettable characters that are hard to shake off. Harry Jones in The Big Sleep is a small-time crook, a grifter who worked on grog-smuggling runs during prohibition, but Chandler  makes us like him ” ‘That a kind of dirty crack, brother,’ he said with something that was near enough to dignity to make me stare at him…He puffed evenly and stared at me level eyed, a funny little hard guy I could have thrown from home plate to second base. A small man in a big man’s world. There was something I liked about him.” Then there’s Moose Malloy in Farewell, My Lovely, a two time murderer and a man that Marlowe “strangely liked” – these are men that in another world, through the eyes of a different writer, we would dislike. But Chandler makes us feel for them, he makes them frail, he makes them hurt – he makes them human:

He [Malloy] didn’t look at me at all. He looked at Mrs Lewin Lockridge Grayle. He leaned forward and his mouth smiled at her and he spoke to her softly

‘I thought I knew the voice,’ he said. ‘I listened to that voice for eight years – all I could remember of it. I kind of liked your hair red, though. Hiya, babe. Long time no see,’

She turned the gun.

‘Get away from me, you son of a bitch,’ she said…she shot him five times in the stomach…He was still alive, but after five in the stomach even a Moose Malloy doesn’t live very long…

He was still on his knees and still trying to get up when the fast wagon got there. It took four men to get him on the stretcher.

‘He has a slight chance…’

‘He wouldn’t want it,’ I said

He didn’t. He died in the night. (Farewell, my Lovely)

In the end though, the lasting gift that Chandler gave us is Philip Marlowe himself. A man that we admire and pity simultaneously. We admire him for his nobility, his willingness to do the right thing even though he knows it is bad for Philip Marlowe, like when he returns to the scene of Anson’s murder in The High Window, when everything in his body is telling him not to. Or when he drives home Merle at the end of that novel saving her from Mrs Murdock. And yet we have to pity Marlowe too. He is a lonely man, with nothing more than his chessmen and pipe for company. He has to keep himself separate from the world to remain a true detective, a man in the world but not of it. But, as Chandler knew, this leaves him an isolated figure:

…a fellow of Marlowe’s type shouldn’t get married, because he is a lonely man, a poor man, a dangerous man, and yet a sympathetic man…I see him always in a lonely street, in lonely rooms, puzzled but never quite defeated. (Letter to Maurice Guiness, 21st February 1959)

And in the end this is sad circumstance for a good man, a man who deserves something better. We read about Marlowe and his adventures and are left with a feeling of sadness for a man we strangely like:

On the way downtown I stopped at a bar and ahd a couple of double Scotches. They didn’t do me any good. All they did was make me think of Silver-Wig, and I never saw her again. (The Big Sleep)

And that, for me at least, is one of the Chandler’s great strengths and it is one of several reasons that his novels will keep being read for the next fifty years.

→ Leave a CommentCategories: Raymond Chandler
Tagged:

Chandler and World War I

March 23, 2009 · 2 Comments

Raymond Chandler fought in World War I with the Canadian Expeditionary Force. He signed up in the second half of 1917 with his best friend at the time, Gordon Pascal and they were both assigned to the Fiftieth Regiment. It is likely that Chandler joined the Canadian army because they offered support to their soldiers’ dependents and this meant that Raymond’s mother, Florence, would be looked after whilst he fought abroad.

What I had not realized, until today, is that Chandler sought exemption from the US draft in June1917. At this time he was living in Santa Barbra, where he managed a branch of the LA Creamery. He was twenty eight years old, tall and, according to his US army draft card, of medium build. His public school education at Dulwich College insilled in him a keen sense of his duty, one that would have made him want to serve in WWI. However in his US draft card he seeks an excemeption “on account of mother”. No further details are given but it goes to show  how Florence Chandler always had to be factored into all his thinking. He always felt that it was his first duty to look after and protect her.

→ 2 CommentsCategories: Raymond Chandler
Tagged: